The recent easing of the US sanctions on North Korea calls on us to consider anew our stance toward other nations as well. It may be expedient at this moment for the US to reopen the paths of free trade to a particular country, but this kind of activity should not be used simply as a tool of diplomacy or furthering our government’s perceived interests; rather, the unrestricted flow of free commerce ought to be our categorical, principled policy toward all foreign nations.
Policy Toward Cuba - U.S. vs. The Rest of The World
Submitted by David A. Gay Sr. on Mon, 06/23/2008 - 13:30The decision made recently by the European Union to end sanctions against Cuba is another example of how we in America are lagging behind the rest of the world in terms of foreign policy. For too long, our pride has kept us from rethinking our policy toward the island nation.
The Cuban Embargo was designed to topple the Communist regime of Fidel Castro, but has done little to that effect. Rather than weaken Castro's dictatorship, we've weakened the Cuban people by helping the regime to restrict the flow of money and choke out the free market.
Regarding Oil Exploration in Alaska
Submitted by David A. Gay Sr. on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 17:24It is an affront to the Bill of Rights, in particular the 10th
amendment, to prohibit Alaska from tapping into its own natural resources.
Beyond the adverse affect to the Alaskan economy, this violation of the
Constitution has driven gasoline prices to unbearable levels, causing
economic strife to every American.
I think it is apalling that we allow Cuba and China to drill in the
Florida Sraits, meanwhile forbidding our own selves from seeking the
common good, in this case, a way to lower the price of gasoline.
David Gay may pose threat for Onondaga County GOP
Submitted by news on Wed, 05/07/2008 - 23:38News 10 Now reports:
Republicans are the Party of Big Government? This Can't Be!
Submitted by news on Mon, 04/14/2008 - 02:00Some of you may be familiar with a survey from about a year ago, in which Americans were asked which party could best be described as "the party of big government." 28% of respondents said that would be the Democratic Party, while just under 40% stated that it was the Republican Party. Now, there might be a number of possible explanations for these results: maybe there wasn't a truly representative sample; maybe the 40% were all Democrats trying to give Republicans a bad name; maybe "big government" was perceived as a good thing!
Seeking "Change" Shouldn't Mean Resorting to Failed Solutions
Submitted by David A. Gay Sr. on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 14:42The principal theme of this election season is clear. Americans want change, and Central New Yorkers are no exception to this. Liberal Democrats, like Dan Maffei, claim to offer change, but they intentionally leave the word undefined. That’s because in reality, they have the same, old, failed solutions to offer: Confiscating the people’s earnings, and promising that it will be used to meet the people’s needs.
Stand Up! It's Time to Re-Define the Lines!
Submitted by David A. Gay Sr. on Sun, 03/30/2008 - 18:30I recently announced my candidacy to the media and I'd like to take this opportunity to further explain my platform.
A message from David Gay
Submitted by news on Sun, 03/30/2008 - 14:11David Gay (R-NY) announces his bid for congressional seat
Submitted by news on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 08:11David Gay, announced his bid for congressional seat in district 25 in central NY.
The federal government has chosen to ignore the idea of living within one's means and sound money, and now our dollar is in a free-fall and many Americans are struggling just to pay for the essentials.
The solutions haven't changed. It is time to return to constitutional government and the concept of sound money. It is time to listen to David Gay.


